Loader
logologo
Alpha Zone
Analysts
My Reading List
Log in
DeFiGaming & MetaverseInfrastructureMarketsNFTs
What are Early Bridgers Doing On-Chain?
main

Key Takeaways

  • Despite all the bridging activity in 2021, 81.4% of all assets among the Early Bridgers segment (wallets scoped out for moving lots of liquidity very early on across 3 or more bridges) are back on Ethereum Mainnet. This can signal that much of the layer-1 narrative has concentrated back to Ethereum, where whales are most comfortable with their assets.
  • Early Bridgers are mainly risk-off as stable-coins make up 75.1% of their portfolio holdings. USDC is the top stable-coin representing 60.52% followed by USDT at 10.90% and lastly DAI at 3.66%.
  • 72.3% of funds among Early Bridgers are simply sitting in their wallets and not being deployed in any protocols to earn yield. This may indicate that early bridgers may be discounting smart contract risk in an even more adversarial environment.
  • Of the TVL deployed into protocols, 63.6% ($22.35m) is deposited into Aave as depositors seemingly prioritizing safety over chasing higher yields on less battle-tested platforms. Again, this may indicate that notable farmers may be discounting smart contract risk.
  • Besides majors like BTC and ETH, some interesting tokens owned by Early Bridgers are GMX, GNS, and MATIC.
  • The early bridgers were analyzed in this report to give an on-chain perspective of ‘risk-on’ behavior. The segment highlights the top players in a more speculative environment in 2021. Revisiting this core group of early wallets who have historically had a larger risk appetite, noted by bridging large sums of money very early on to uncharted ecosystems can give us insights on the on-chain behavior and trends of potential yield opportunities and any red flags of specific narratives.

Introduction

2021 was touted as the year of alternative L1s and “Ethereum Killers”. With the exorbitant gas fees on Ethereum, many users flocked to various L1s and L2s in search of cheaper transaction costs, ecosystem incentives, and of course higher yields. Given how Early Bridgers are often experimental and quick to new opportunities, this report will investigate what these users are currently doing on-chain in this tumultuous market.

Methodology

To come up with a list of early bridger wallets, we needed to first identify the ‘high signal bridges’. This was primarily decided through a combination of bridge volume, TVL, and the number of dApps on the chain. The 5 bridges chosen are as follows:

  1. Avalanche Bridge
  2. Arbitrum Bridge
  3. Optimism Bridge
  4. Metis Bridge
  5. Rainbow Aurora Bridge

A wallet will be considered as an Early Bridger if they fulfill these 2 requirements:

  • Used 3 or more of the above bridges
  • Bridged over $100k or more on each bridge and was within the initial 500 wallets to deposit

Below is a list of 15 active wallet addresses that qualified based on the above parameters.

Wallet AddressLabel on Nansen
0x66b870ddf78c975af5cd8edc6de25eca81791de1🤓 Oapital: 0x66b
0xbdfa4f4492dd7b7cf211209c4791af8d52bf5c50🤓 First Mover Staking
0x42657c74d0fc99baf2b313cfa245a1c8e4ce1afbSelf-Destruct Beneficiary
0x93e5204e7033483985bcc94e48283f3359b2be69"peeeter" on OpenSea
0xee8e0fcc8bff03ec5f100d02cb7b3196d78863a75ucms.eth
0x85591bfabb18be044fa98d72f7093469c588483c"nbvvvv" on OpenSea
0x2ef3d49f6cb7a04e4164902748c09bbd3ffa786fHeavy Dex Trader
0xf8fa2e5f52ad3c3c49ffa1f3f4e6f3ccefa4011eMedium Uniswap V3 LP
0x698b9d56abec3faa97ffce6478a4c7ddbadd4116amoosed.eth
0xa9cdf0542a1128c5caca1e81521a09aec8abe1a7ruggablecapital.eth
0xcbd6b0dee49eea88a3343ff4e5a2423586b4c1d6🤓 "BobbyAxelRod" on OpenSea
0x500bea59133e20dc63b7e88913b30348494b84baMedium Uniswap V3 LP
0x896b94f4f27f12369698c302e2049cae86936bbb🤓 Smart Dex Trader
0xf3f5c252e8acd60671f92c7f72cf33661221ef42Medium Uniswap V3 LP
0x555187752ef6d73758862b5d364aab362c996d0e🤓 Airdrop Pro
Nansen Query
Source: Nansen Query

The Avalanche and Arbitrum bridges were by far the top used bridges with the highest volume amongst the Early Bridgers. $11.9m was bridged over to Arbitrum and $9.89m was bridged over to Avalanche. Metis and Optimism bridge saw similar volumes at $4.29m and $3.92m respectively. The rainbow Aurora bridge came in last at $2.88m.

Aggregate Chain Allocation

Despite all the bridging activity in 2021, Ethereum remains the chain of choice during market turmoil by a large majority as 81.4% of assets among the Early Bridgers are now back on Mainnet. BNB Chain comes in second at 6.21%, Polygon at 5.29%, and lastly Avalanche at 3.58%. This suggests that alternative EVM-compatible L1s and L2s have largely failed in capturing sustainable market share. With the collapse in DeFi yields and overall on-chain activity, this doesn’t come off as too surprising. Given how ETH gas fees have remained very affordable and most battle-tested protocols are on Ethereum, there is very little reason to venture out especially when security is being prioritized.

Aggregate Token and Protocol Allocation

Taking a look at token allocation, a majority of wallets are risk-off and holding stable-coins. At the time of writing, stable-coins make up 75.1% of the token allocation for all 15 wallets. USDC is the top stable-coin of choice, representing 60.52% followed by USDT at 10.90% and lastly DAI at 3.66%.

In addition, by looking at protocol allocation, we can determine that 72.3% of funds are simply sitting in the wallets and not being deployed in any protocols to earn yield. In fact, 6 out of the 15 wallets have >95% of their portfolio only in their wallet. With DeFi yields plummeting, it is evident the early bridgers segment is being prudent to have idle funds in a wallet as the yields offered are often not high enough to compensate for the smart contract risk. For context, blue-chip protocols like Aave, Compound, and Curve are offering sub 1% yields on stable-coins like USDC, BUSD, DAI, and USDT.

Early Bridger On-Chain Wallet Deep-dives

This wallet needs no introduction as they’re ranked first on both Debank and DegenScore. They continue to be a DeFi power user even in an environment of low yields, smart contract risk, and plummeting asset prices. While a majority of assets (57.1%) are on Ethereum, 22.7% are on Arbitrum and 14.74% are on Avalanche. A majority of the portfolio is also made up of blue-chip assets like WBTC, ETH, and stable-coins.

With how spread out the assets are across chains and protocols, it appears the user’s primary goal is to reduce idiosyncratic risk and avoid a single point of failure. This is evident as the wallet will supply stable-coins into protocols like Sturdy Finance and Venus that offers a marginally higher yield than Aave but arguably has much higher smart contract risk. The user is clearly protocol and chain agnostic with a preference for the Ethereum and layer-2 space, alongside the greater EVM ecosystem.

The primary protocols used are Gearbox, GMX, Convex Finance, Euler FInance, and Aave.

This wallet has a portfolio value of $22.4m and is in 99% stables with USDC being the dominant choice. A little over half of the USDC is supplied on Aave earning 0.84% while the remaining sits inside the wallet.

Interestingly, this wallet has 81% of its value; $665k of ETH staked in Bend DAO earning 7% yield. Given how Lido is offering 8.5% APR on staked ETH, it’s unsure why the user would opt for a much higher smart contract risk coupled with the lower yield on their large ETH position.

95.1% of the total assets are simply held inside the wallet and the token allocation is split between tokens like USDC, ETH, WBTC, and USDT.

On 10 Nov 2022, this wallet swapped $4m of USDT to $3.99m USDC via 1inch presumably on fears of USDT de-pegging

The user decided to pull its USDT liquidity from Uniswap and converted it entirely to USDC through CowSwap on 11 Nov 2022. The wallet currently holds $2.61m of USDC and no other material positions

This wallet holds 73% of his portfolio in GNS (Gains Network) and has been TWAPing his buys since 31 Oct 2022. There has also been some minor selling happening since 15 Nov 2022. With FTX blowing up, decentralized perpetual exchanges are catching on as a new narrative. Similar to GMX, a large portion of the fees generated from traders on Gains Network are redirected to stakers as real yield.

This wallet has 98% of its assets on the Fantom ecosystem; specifically in Geist Finance. It is currently supplying $1.88m of ETH, $208k BTC, and is borrowing $1.27m USDC and $114k USDT. The user is essentially getting free leverage as they’re being paid to borrow via token incentives.

AssetsTVLTotal BorrowedDeposit APYBorrow APY
ETH$16.57m$12.08m11.16%+0.12%-30.6%+0.53%
BTC$6.32m$719k0.08%+0.32%-1.40%+8.53%
USDC$41.23m$5.81m0.04%+0.12%-0.63%+2.69%
USDT$30.36m$3.59m0.03%+0.17%-0.53%+14.07%
                                 

Geist Finance

This wallet is currently in 100% stable-coins (primarily USDC) and has opened a short position on ETH by depositing $3.07m USDC into Aave and borrowing $1.35m ETH.

DeFi Saver
Source: DeFi Saver

The Airdrop Pro wallet has its entire portfolio in a levered long position on Aave. They supplied $17.9m of stETH and borrowed $10.9m ETH.

38.5% of the portfolio consists of the MATIC token. The owner originally unstaked its position on 21 May 2022, made a few minor sells on 22 May 2022, and has held the remainder of the tokens.

Other notable positions are $917k of BNB supplied on Venus, $182k of FTM, and $173k of MVI (Metaverse Index).

This wallet remains very risk-on with ETH making up 48.5% of the entire portfolio and WBTC at 42.6%. Most of the assets are currently sitting idle in the wallet (59.2%) and are not deployed on many protocols. While Ethereum appears to be the chain of choice given its 72.1% allocation, 19.1% was also allocated to Optimism where half of the WBTC position resides.

Farming Opportunities

In order to identify farming opportunities within the list of 15 Early Bridger wallet addresses, we started filtering down the vast list of protocols within each wallet. Low-conviction protocols that represented less than 3% of each wallet’s TVL were removed. We then summed up all the remaining protocol deposits across the 15 wallets and ranked them by TVL and wallet count. The end result is the below table with 15 of the most popular protocols

  • As expected, most of the TVL ($22.35m) sits within Aave and depositors are prioritizing safety over chasing high yields
  • GMX (Arbitrum) comes in at a far second with 2 wallet counts and $3.72m in TVL
    • A majority of it is in GLP ($2.95m) and the rest is in GMX or esGMX
  • Wallet 0xbd labeled as 🤓 First Mover Staking is one of the few wallets that continues to be active in numerous DeFi protocols
ProtocolTVL Across 15 WalletsWallet Count
Aave$22.35m4
GMX (Arbitrum)$3.72m2
Gearbox$2.65m2
Magpie XYZ (BSC)$2.09m1
Convex Finance$1.84m1
Euler Finance$1.72m1
Aave (AVAX)$1.49m1
Venus$1.31m2
Sturdy Finance$850k1
GMX (AVAX)$750k1
Pika Protocol$720k1
BendDAO$660k1
Geist Finance (FTM)$650k1
Lyra Finance$340k1
Beethoven (OP)$242k1
Aura Finance$180k2

Closing Thoughts

From our analysis of looking into the on-chain activity of Early Bridgers, it is evident that most wallets are exhibiting risk-off behavior. In addition to holding a large majority of their assets in stable-coins like USDC and USDT, most wallets are wary of smart contract risk and are not depositing funds into any protocols either.

While 2021 was the year of alternative L1s, 81.4% of all assets among the Early Bridgers segment are now back on Ethereum Mainnet. During market downturns, Ethereum continues to be the undisputed leader for whales to park their funds. To continue monitoring Early Bridgers, we suggest setting up Smart Alerts to be notified whenever they bridge funds to new ecosystems or starts to deploy their stable-coin holdings.

You might also like
Article cover
Sentient Memes and The Fight For Our Attention
Despite early attention, most AI-driven meme tokens lack sustainable community support and practical use cases, suggesting that only a few may endure
Disclosure: The authors of this content and members of Nansen may be participating or invested in some of the protocols or tokens mentioned herein. The foregoing statement acts as a disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and is not a recommendation to purchase or invest in any token or participate in any protocol. Nansen does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any token or protocol. The content herein is meant purely for educational and informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as financial, investment, legal, tax or any other professional or other advice. None of the content and information herein is presented to induce or to attempt to induce any reader or other person to buy, sell or hold any token or participate in any protocol or enter into, or offer to enter into, any agreement for or with a view to buying or selling any token or participating in any protocol. Statements made herein (including statements of opinion, if any) are wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader or any other person. Readers are strongly urged to exercise caution and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any decision to buy or sell any token or participate in any protocol. Observations and views expressed herein may be changed by Nansen at any time without notice. Nansen accepts no liability whatsoever for any losses or liabilities arising from the use of or reliance on any of this content.