Loader
logologo
Alpha Zone
Analysts
My Reading List
Log in
DeFiGaming & MetaverseInfrastructureMarketsNFTs
Nansen Macro Newsletter November 28, 2022
Aurelie Barthere
main

Relevant macro data and events

China and EM

The Chinese PBoC held its policy rate at 3.65% but cut its bank reserve requirement rate by 25 bps to 11%. Surging covid cases and hesitancy in dropping zero-covid quarantines led to street protests erupting in several Chinese cities. Following last month’s plan on real estate rescue, ICBC pledged 655bn yuan in credit lines to 12 Chinese developers. It followed prior lending initiatives from China Construction Bank.

In Taiwan, President Tsai Ing-wen resigned as head of the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) after the opposition party, the Kuomintang (KMT), won several local elections including in Taipei. The KMT is considered less of a “China hawk” than the DPP.

In the rest of EM, the central banks of South Africa and Korea hiked by 75bp, to 7%, and by 25bp, to 3.25%, respectively.

DM inflation

Further inflation prints in DM markets came below expectations: German Oct. PPI at 34.5% vs 41.5% expected and Hong Kong CPI at 1.8% vs 2.0%e.

US

The US Conference Board leading indicator fell by 0.8% in October, led by lower consumer confidence and negative prospects for housing and manufacturing. The indicator has existed since 2000, and, based on its historical leading property, suggests that the US economy is entering a recession. The Chicago (-0.05 vs -0.03 expected) and Richmond confidence survey (-9 as expected) indicated deteriorating demand for manufacturing but resilient demand for services, with only slightly less difficulty to find skilled workers.

The US 30 yr mortgage rate declined for the third consecutive week from 7.14% at its peak, to 6.67%. Coincidentally, housing demand indicators recovered slightly.

US initial jobless claims came slightly above consensus at 240k vs 225k expected.

Flash PMIs

Eurozone Manufacturing (47.3) and Services (48.6) both beat expectations (46 and 48), led by improved sentiment in Germany. UK Manufacturing and Services came in at 46.2 and 48.8 vs 45.7 and 48 expected, respectively. The US Manufacturing PMI at 47.6 and Services PMI at 46.1, disappointed the consensus of 50 and 47.9. Japan Manufacturing PMI, at 49.4 came below the 50.9 consensus. Japan Services PMI was down 3.2 points to 50.

Europe

In the Eurozone, confirming the better-than-expected PMI prints, the German Ifo expectations survey rose to 80, above the 77 forecast. In Sweden, the Riksbank delivered a 75bp, taking its policy rate to 2.5%.

What to pay attention to this week: The employment part of the Fed equation

Tuesday 29: Chinese Manufacturing (expected at 50) and Non-manufacturing (48e) PMI

Wednesday 30: German Nov. employment data (unemployment rate forecast at 5.5%). / The Eurozone CPI should reflect decreasing energy prices (expected at 10.4% YoY).

US Nov. ADP Nonfarm Employment Change, consensus at 200K. / Q3 GDP consensus at 2.7%. / JOLTs job openings (10.3m consensus). / Powell is due to speak on November 30 at the Brookings Institution about the labor market and the economic outlook.

China Nov. Caixin manufacturing PMI (49e).

Thursday 1 Dec: US Oct. core PCE (5% YoY expected). / US ISM manufacturing PMI (49.8e).

Friday 2 Dec: US non-farm payroll (consensus 200k), unemployment rate (5.3%e) and participation rate (prior 62.2%).

Sunday 4 Dec: China Caixin services PMI (prior 48.4)

Nansen’s take

This week was calm on the data front but saw unusual political and social volatility in Asia. In Mainland China, local protests are worth monitoring closely. It is difficult to speculate on their political repercussions. We will just observe that the social capital that would be consumed by sticking to zero-covid policies seems to be growing heavier. All things equal, this probably increases the probability of China reopening in 2023, despite surging covid cases. It also pushes the Chinese authorities to address the weakness in domestic demand and employment. So far, the authorities have delivered RRR rate cuts and asked the national banks to extend lines of credit to real estate developers (to address the slump in the property markets and preserve domestic wealth, which is heavily skewed towards real estate). If this momentum continues (see Chinese flash PMIs next week), weak economic data will likely be followed by more loosening in monetary and fiscal conditions (negative CNY and potentially positive Chinese risk assets).

US vs Europe: Growth differential less in favor of the US

In Europe, German businesses are growing more confident. Iit seems that the country has avoided, so far, a natural gas crunch and significant demand destruction. UK PMIs also surprised positively, with surveyed businesses quoting less political uncertainty. Short-term, this is bullish EUR and GBP vs USD, especially as US PMIs have been, in contrast, disappointing expectations (see chart below). Long-term it is too early to call for a DXY peak given a relatively solid US economy (next week’s employment data might inform us on the state of the US labor market which has remained resilient so far).

Overall, the macro messages of the flash PMIs were: weakness in manufacturing new orders, demand for services holding better than manufacturing but slowing, less pressure from commodity inflation, subsiding supply chain bottlenecks, and, on the employment front, less willingness to replace workers who quit. The levels and messages from PMIs strike us as forecasting slowing growth but no sharp recession (yet). Could it be that the soft landing scenario is starting to materialize? Are inflationary pressures receding without real growth “falling off a cliff”?

Our main scenario maintains a sharper slow down, as the Fed follows a lagging core CPI that takes time to return to the 2% target (despite slowing headline inflation). We see the 1970s-80s developments (see chart below) as a relevant historical framework. In 1974, the Fed only stopped hiking after the unemployment rate had surged by ~90 bps to 5.5%. In 1980, the Fed paused as the unemployment rate reached 7.6%. For crypto, more patience is likely warranted to call for a bottom. Even as on-chain indicators stand at multi-year levels of cheapness, fundamentals have not yet turned favorable.

Charts that matter

US - Eurozone positive growth differential decreases

The 1970s-1980s playbook: The Fed did not hike before a significant jump in unemployment

On-chain and market indicators

Cross-asset momentum: deteriorating DXY returns not enough to support crypto price stabilization yet

Cross-asset return momentum
Source: Cross-asset return momentum

Stablecoin indicator still in panic

Nansen Smart Money Stable Coin Indicator (Source: Nansen analysis; share of stable coins of total USD balance in labelled “smart-money “wallets”, last data point 20 Nov. 2021)
Source: Nansen Smart Money Stable Coin Indicator (Source: Nansen analysis; share of stable coins of total USD balance in labelled “smart-money “wallets”, last data point 20 Nov. 2021)

Stablecoin indicator: ETH / USDC backtest

Nansen Smart Money Stable Coin Indicator: ETH Backtest
Source: Nansen Smart Money Stable Coin Indicator: ETH Backtest

Stablecoin indicator: BTC / USDC backtest

Nansen Smart Money Stable Coin Indicator: BTC Backtest
Source: Nansen Smart Money Stable Coin Indicator: BTC Backtest

BTC long-term indicator: central bank balance sheet growth / US yield curve not supportive yet, MVRV close to risk-on

Our Bitcoin cyclical indicator recommended to neutralize BTC in February 2021 (hypothetical portfolio of 100% BTC / 0% USDC and vice versa). It has not yet moved to “long” BTC but is close to
Source: Our Bitcoin cyclical indicator recommended to neutralize BTC in February 2021 (hypothetical portfolio of 100% BTC / 0% USDC and vice versa). It has not yet moved to “long” BTC but is close to

BTC long-term indicator: BTC / USDC backtest

BTC indicator backtest (Source: Nansen analysis; G4 central bank balance sheet growth, US yield curve and Bitcoin market-value-to-realised-value, last data point 18 Nov. 2022)
Source: BTC indicator backtest (Source: Nansen analysis; G4 central bank balance sheet growth, US yield curve and Bitcoin market-value-to-realised-value, last data point 18 Nov. 2022)

Equity Risk Premium at 7.9%

Equity Risk Premium or ERP (Nansen analysis, based on S&P500 options)
Source: Equity Risk Premium or ERP (Nansen analysis, based on S&P500 options)

Equity Risk Premium: high but not at capitulation levels

 ERP, long time-frame
Source: ERP, long time-frame
You might also like
Article cover
Research Weekly: Crypto Xmas and 2025
The crypto markets’ consolidation post-US-elections has been shallow so far, with a “healthy” rotation across tokens outperforming December’s seasonal
Professional
Disclosure: The authors of this content and members of Nansen may be participating or invested in some of the protocols or tokens mentioned herein. The foregoing statement acts as a disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and is not a recommendation to purchase or invest in any token or participate in any protocol. Nansen does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any token or protocol. The content herein is meant purely for educational and informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as financial, investment, legal, tax or any other professional or other advice. None of the content and information herein is presented to induce or to attempt to induce any reader or other person to buy, sell or hold any token or participate in any protocol or enter into, or offer to enter into, any agreement for or with a view to buying or selling any token or participating in any protocol. Statements made herein (including statements of opinion, if any) are wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader or any other person. Readers are strongly urged to exercise caution and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any decision to buy or sell any token or participate in any protocol. Observations and views expressed herein may be changed by Nansen at any time without notice. Nansen accepts no liability whatsoever for any losses or liabilities arising from the use of or reliance on any of this content.